<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Gravitational Lensing | Andrew Robertson</title><link>https://andrew-robertson.github.io/tags/gravitational-lensing/</link><atom:link href="https://andrew-robertson.github.io/tags/gravitational-lensing/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Gravitational Lensing</description><generator>Hugo Blox Builder (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Strong Gravitational Lensing</title><link>https://andrew-robertson.github.io/research/stronglensing/</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://andrew-robertson.github.io/research/stronglensing/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="overview"&gt;Overview&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Strong gravitational lensing occurs when a massive object—such as a galaxy or cluster—bends light from a more distant source, producing multiple images, arcs, or even complete &lt;em&gt;Einstein rings&lt;/em&gt;. Because gravity depends only on mass (not whether it is luminous or dark), lensing provides a direct way to map the distribution of dark matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is also one of the most sensitive probes of small-scale structure: even low-mass subhaloes can leave detectable imprints in the detailed morphology of lensed images.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My work focuses on using strong lensing as a test of dark matter physics, while ensuring that the inferences drawn are robust to modelling assumptions and observational limitations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="galaxy-scale-strong-lensing"&gt;Galaxy-scale strong lensing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Galaxy-scale lenses provide one of the cleanest ways to detect dark matter substructure. In these systems, small perturbations to lensed arcs or Einstein rings can reveal the presence of otherwise invisible subhaloes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A handful of low-mass substurctures have now been detected using both optical imaging and VLBI (radio) observations. These measurements are often interpreted as constraints on the abundance and internal structure of dark matter subhaloes, and therefore on the nature of dark matter itself.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the interpretation is not always straightforward. A key focus of my work is testing how robust these inferences are using realistic mock datasets. By generating synthetic observations and analysing them with the same tools used on real data, we can assess when apparent detections genuinely require new dark matter physics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="example-sdss-j09461006"&gt;Example: SDSS J0946+1006&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lens system &lt;strong&gt;SDSS J0946+1006&lt;/strong&gt; has been widely discussed as evidence for a very dense dark matter subhalo.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In
, we showed that the data can also be explained if the perturber hosts a faint galaxy. When this is included in the modelling, there is no need to invoke an unusually compact dark matter structure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This system illustrates how sensitive lensing inferences can be to seemingly small modelling choices, and why careful validation is essential.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;h2 id="cluster-scale-strong-lensing"&gt;Cluster-scale strong lensing&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;figure class="wrapped-figure wrapped-figure-right"&gt;
&lt;img src="https://andrew-robertson.github.io/images/Abell370.jpg" alt="Abell 370 strong lensing"&gt;
&lt;figcaption&gt;
Strong lensing galaxy cluster Abell 370. Image credit: NASA, ESA, and J. Lotz and the HFF Team (STScI)
&lt;/figcaption&gt;
&lt;/figure&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On larger scales, galaxy clusters produce complex networks of arcs and multiple images, allowing detailed reconstruction of their mass distributions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Several studies have suggested potential discrepancies between observed cluster substructure and predictions from CDM simulations. These include claims of an excess of massive subhaloes or differences in their spatial distribution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While these results are intriguing, their interpretation remains uncertain. In particular, comparisons between simulations and observations can be affected by selection effects, projection, and modelling assumptions. In
, I argued that some reported tensions may be less significant than initially claimed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even so, cluster-scale lensing remains a promising avenue for testing dark matter models, particularly as both simulations and observational datasets improve.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h3 id="merging-clusters"&gt;Merging clusters&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Merging clusters provide a complementary test of dark matter physics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In these systems, the different components—stars (galaxies), gas, and dark matter—can become spatially separated during the merger. By comparing their relative distributions, it is possible to constrain properties such as the self-interaction cross-section of dark matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;strong&gt;Bullet Cluster&lt;/strong&gt; is the most famous example, and has provided some of the strongest constraints on self-interacting dark matter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am currently involved in efforts to interpret new observations of merging clusters, including a recently-completed JWST programmes
and a recently-accepted JWST proposal to
. This work combines simulations and lensing analyses to understand how reliably we can extract constraints on dark matter physics from these systems.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>